Requirements for manuscripts:
The content of manuscripts should meet the profile of the collection. The provided job should be to have a scientific novelty, to have theoretical or practical importance.
Submitted to the editorial office:
1. Electronic version of the manuscript in MS Word.
2. A printed copy of the manuscript strictly corresponding to the electronic version.
The volume of the manuscript should be from 5 full pages of computer text, font Times New Roman pt 12, 1 line spacing.
Accompanying forms:
1. Conclusion on the possibility of open publication.
2. Two positive reviews, certified by the signature of the reviewer and the seal of the institution (indicating the position and place of work of the reviewer).
3. Information about the authors: place of work with indication of the Department, academic degree and academic title; telephone, postal and e-mail address.
Structure of the manuscript:
1. UDC (universal decimal classifier);
2. title;
3. the initials and surnames of authors (if authors are from different institutions, after each name with a Superscript numeral corresponding to the Superscript number before the name of the institution should indicate how the establishment works);
4. text of the abstract to the article (not less than 80 words) in Russian and English;
5. key words/phrases (up to 10 words) in Russian and English;
6. the text of the manuscript, decorated according to the requirements;
7. references with full output data, at least 10 titles in Russian and English (to make in accordance with GOST R 7.05-2008 "Bibliographic reference"). When transliterating titles of publications and sources for the English version (if these sources do not have an official English name), follow the system ALA-LC (LC).
Requirements for manuscript preparation:
All requirements are displayed in the styles of the attached template file. Authors are kindly requested not to change the structure of the file or insert additional line breaks and other design elements.
Page size – A4; margins (top/bottom/left/right), cm: 2,7/2,3/1,8/1,8; "red line" - 0.75 cm. Hyphenation included.
Title of the article: Arial, capital letters, bold, size 14 PT, alignment-left, no hyphenation.
The authors ' names: Times New Roman, italic, size 12 PT, alignment – left-aligned.
Information about the organisation: Times New Roman, italic 10 PT, alignment – left-aligned.
Abstract: volume - not less than 70 words; size-10 PT; "red line" – 0.75 cm; alignment-width.
Main text: Times New Roman, regular, size 12 PT, in two columns, line spacing 1, alignment-width.
Design drawings: Drawings shall be submitted as a TIFF, PNG, JPEG, WMF. The size of the figures should not exceed the size of one page. The figure caption is printed in regular (non-bold) font size 10 PT and can be continued on the next line with width alignment if necessary. Responsibility for the quality of drawings lies with the authors.
Table design: width-one (two) column. All tables are numbered and named. The table header is printed lean with font size 10 PT.
The list of references: references to used sources are given in the text and are denoted by numbers in square brackets (e.g., [1], [2, 3], [4-7], [4, p. 23-28].). At registration of the bibliographic list GOST R 7.05-2008 is used.
Making formulas: formulas are executed in the editor MS Word Microsoft Equation Editor. For a set of variables (letters) should use the font Times, italic, not bold (set in the settings): for example, t, V, s, U. for a set of numbers should use the font Times, not italic(!), not fat: for example, 1, 2, 15. The size of the font for variables and numbers – 12 PT. The size of the remaining formula elements: large index – 8pt; small index – 6pт; major character (sum, integral) – 14pт; the small symbol is 11pt, the formulas are aligned in the center, the formula is numbered in parentheses on the right, for example, (1).
The text should be carefully read and checked by the authors.
The issue of publication of the manuscript or its rejection is decided by the editorial Board of the collection, and its decision is final. If the manuscript is returned for correction, the date of its submission shall be the date of receipt by the editorial office of the corrected text. The editorial Board has the right to reject the previously published material of the author or an article with incorrect borrowing (no more than 30% of the borrowed text from open sources is allowed in the articles).).
Conditions for publication of manuscripts:
Manuscripts in the collection are printed free of charge.
Order of consideration and review of manuscripts:
All articles published in the collection of scientific works "Bulletin of modern technologies" are subject to mandatory internal review. When entering the editorial office, each article is assigned a registration number. The presence of an external review from the author is allowed, but can not be the basis for its release from internal review. Review of manuscripts is free of charge. The manuscript of a scientific article submitted to the editorial office of the collection is considered by the Executive Secretary of the editorial Board for compliance with the profile of the publication, the accepted requirements for the material and structure of the article. Manuscripts that do not meet the accepted requirements for publication are not registered and are not allowed for further consideration, as notified to the authors in any available way.
If there are comments on the technical design of the manuscript, the author is sent a proposal to eliminate the identified shortcomings and submit the manuscript again. The Executive Secretary of the editorial Board sends the article for review to one or, if necessary, two reviewers from among the members of the editorial Board, as well as from scientists who are not members of the editorial Board, who have a doctorate degree in the scientific field, corresponding to the content of the article, who are recognized experts on the subject of peer-reviewed materials and who have publications on the subject of the peer-reviewed article in the publications included in the list of the HAC. The reviewer must confirm his / her competence in the scientific field of the reviewed material. A reviewer of the manuscript submitted in co-authorship with a member of the editorial Board and the editorial Board of the collection may not be a co- author - a member of the editorial Council or the editorial Board. A reviewer of an article submitted by a post-graduate student, a doctoral student, an applicant for an academic degree may not be a member of the editorial Board or the editorial Board, if he is the scientific supervisor (scientific adviser) of a post-graduate student, a doctoral student or an applicant. Review period - from 7 to 30 days from the date of receipt of the article to the editor. The manuscript of the article is sent to the reviewer by e-mail or sent in person in printed form. Reviewers are notified that the submitted manuscript is the object of intellectual property of the author.
Reviewers are not allowed to disclose or otherwise use the content of the article before its publication, making copies for personal use, transfer the article to another reviewer without the permission of the editor-in-chief or the Executive Secretary. The review is confidential. The results of the internal review are reported to the author by e-mail. At the written request of the author(s), electronic copies of negative reviews are sent to him / her by e-mail without specifying the name of the reviewer. Information about the reviewers are not reported to the author. Comments and recommendations on the revision of the manuscript of the article contained in the review shall be communicated to the author by e-mail with an indication of the deadline for re-submission of the article. Upon receipt of the revised version of the manuscript, it is submitted to the same reviewer. Articles that have received positive reviews are considered by the editorial Board of the collection and final decisions on their inclusion in the next or subsequent issues are made. In case of a positive conclusion of the editorial Board, the author is sent an e – mail notification of acceptance and terms of publication of the article, in case of rejection-a reasoned refusal. The original reviews are kept in the editorial office for five years from the date of publication of the article. Copies of reviews are submitted by the editors to the HAC upon request. The review should reflect: compliance of the material presented in the article, the profile of the collection; assessment of the relevance of the content of the article; the significance of the scientific and practical results of research; contain qualitative and / or quantitative assessment of the actual and illustrative material given in the article; the correctness and accuracy of the definitions and formulations used (or introduced); reasonable conclusions about the article as a whole; comments, specific recommendations for its improvement. The review should be completed with clear conclusions (to recommend the material for publication, to publish the material after revision, which can be made by the editorial Board, to publish the material after revision, which can be made by the author, to consider the publication of the manuscript inappropriate). When recommending " publish material after revision...", please indicate which comments (requirements for this material) are mandatory from the reviewer's point of view, and which can be considered as suggestions. The volume of reviewing-from one page of the text. If there is an indication of the need for revision in the review of the article, the authors are notified about it in any available way. In this case, the date of receipt to the editor is the date of receipt of the revised article. If the article on the recommendation of the reviewer has undergone significant author's processing, it is sent for re-reviewing to the same reviewer. In case of disagreement with the opinion of the reviewer, the author of the article has the right to provide a reasoned response to the editorial Board. The article can be sent for re-reviewing or for approval to the editor-in-chief of the publication. The editors reserve the right to reject articles in case of inability or unwillingness of the author to take into account the wishes of the editorial Board. The decision on expediency of publication after reviewing is made by the Deputy editor-in-chief in coordination with the editor-in-chief. The Executive Secretary of the editorial Board informs the author about the decision on the article. In case of refusal to publish the article, the author is refused. Corrections of stylistic, nomenclature or formal nature that do not affect the content of the article are made in the article without the consent of the author. Reviews of manuscripts are provided by the editors to the authors of manuscripts and expert councils of the WAC at their request. The original manuscripts accepted for publication are kept together with the reviews in the editorial archive for one calendar year after which they are destroyed by the act. Manuscripts are not returned to the authors.
Университет 
EN 
SY 
